![]() ![]() Which is nice as many other OS's just seem to become more bloated with each iteration. Sure it ain't scientific, but I think this update has gotten things moving along a tad faster, as have all the other. Also, the errors are like +/- 0.2-0.3 sec depending on if I was reaching for my beer during the timing and missed seeing the window pop up. (Task or App-10.2.3 1st run/Subsequent run-10.2.4 1st run/Subsequent run) ![]() The following times are in seconds, timed from when icon clicked on in the Dock to when the application window was fully loaded and ready to go. The shutdown time has definitely been trimmed, but most of us OS X users will not be enjoying this speed advantage much as.we just don't have to shut down that much when the sleep/wake state is so quick and stable to use unlike my WinBlows computers. Hardware: Powerbook G4 667 MHz Gigabit Ethernet,768 MB RAM, 30 GB HDġ0.2.3 => Cold Boot = 1:06, Shutdown 0:45, Login 5-7sec, Logout 6-15secġ0.2.4 => Cold Boot = 1:07, Shutdown 0:15, Login 6sec, Logout 5sec Yeah, I wanted to know if it was just my perceptions being fooled by my expectations after installing a OS upgrade or if this was indeed a real effect. OK, here's my anal retentive self doing rough stopwatch timings for various application launch times under 10.2.3 and 10.2.4 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |